Watch out for this gov web site!
 

This is REALLY scary!!!!
DO NOT go to cars.gov!!!
Watch this you tube video of an actual TV program about the cars.gov site and learn what our current government and czars are doing now!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bWs12ccbOiE

If it scares you as much as it did me, pass this video along to everyone in your address book.
If you don't believe, go to the website and click OK after you've been warned.

Holly Crap!!! :ack2: :eek:
This is unbelievable, or is it?
Thanks for the warning.
Lou

:eek::eek::eek:

Heck, I wonder how many other such acceptance screens I have clicked on that may have had similar language? Damned certain I'm not going to go to ANY ".gov" sites. Hmm, I know I went to the IRS site while doing taxes.... Wonder what I agreed to there? :banghead:

It has been revised .What scares the crap out of me is that it needed to be revise.What commie idiot writes this stuff ?

It's called "plausible deniability". The government can try to pull crap like this just to see what happens. If it flies without much resistance, then good for them. But if there is a lot of flak generated, then they can blame it on some scapegoat and claim it isn't official policy. We've seen this sort of thing time and time again.

But certainly, passing this sort of thing in a HUGE omnibus bill where no one can possibly read all the fine print, CAN certainly happen, if it has not already, under the guise of homeland security. Certainly the world trade center attack was a huge windfall for those people who would like nothing better than to reduce us even further to just being working tax cattle who do as we are told and button our lips about what we think about it.

Call me skeptical but yeah right, it has been revised. How do we know?

I think that the implication that they CAN do that, as well as WANT TO do it, is just as unsettling.....

Would anyone really want to go to any website that had the capability of invading your privacy at will via routines that would analyze your computer system remotely? I believe that there is a federal law against anyone tying into someone else's network without their permission, so you have to wonder how something like this can coincide and not conflict with such a law.... Oh yeah, do as we SAY, not as we DO kind of laws..... :rolleyes:

Because the Gov't told us so !:banghead::banghead:

Okay so Orwell missed it instead of 1984 he should have titled the book 2009. But wow what is next on the agenda of this new president and cabinet. :banghead::shrug01: