A RESPONSE FROM CORVETTE FORUM

[Rich Z]

Originally Posted by MRS. XTREME

Rich ,please dont take this in a disrespectful way-

We were banned fine , good and dandy BUT the parts we were selling were our parts they didnt belong to anyone else.
When they locked the thread over there they sent an email within minutes and stated they locked it because "you cant sell customers parts".Meanwhile we sent them an email stating this was not anyone else's parts except our own we owned them, within 5mins of that email we were banned.And also asked them how you can assume which parts we sell our our own and which aren't??
So still makes no sense to us, but that's the last I am going to talk about this issue because now we are --

Thanks for everyones input good and bad. I learned quite a bit

No, I'm not taking offense at this at all. I just see both sides to it. I agree that the site does have rules that they need to enforce. But I do not think the way you were handled in reference to their rules was in the best interests of all involved.

That is simply my opinion.....

[Shadow]

Originally Posted by Rich Z

No, I'm not taking offense at this at all. I just see both sides to it. I agree that the site does have rules that they need to enforce. But I do not think the way you were handled in reference to their rules was in the best interests of all involved.

That is simply my opinion.....

[Yellow]

Originally Posted by Shadow

Greg has certainly helped me as well. But God fobid you mention that on the other forum

I've seen cases where, although the "rules" state you can give "props" to a non-supporting vendor, the threads have been locked or deleted when such activity has occurred "quoting "non-supporting vendor" ?

If you want to know anout this ask Greg, and if he wants to explain it to you then fine.

[Yellow]

Originally Posted by Shadow

That said, if there was a previous dialogue that we may not be privy to here, then fine, the ban was deserved.

I would assume this is the case with most banning