|
| Movie Reviews As requested! This forum might save us some $$ on movies that should have been left on the cutting room floor... |
 |
06-24-2008, 10:22 AM
|
#1
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Bradenton, Fl.
Posts: 2,363
Name :
|
GET SMART
|
|
|
|
06-24-2008, 10:37 AM
|
#2
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: port of indecision
Posts: 5,604
Name :
|
|
|
|
|
|
06-24-2008, 12:51 PM
|
#3
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Bradenton, Fl.
Posts: 2,363
Name :
|
Yeah, missed it by ( ) that much!!!! 
|
|
|
|
|
06-24-2008, 01:06 PM
|
#4
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: port of indecision
Posts: 5,604
Name :
|
|
|
|
|
|
06-25-2008, 09:34 PM
|
#5
|
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Bradenton, Fl.
Posts: 263
Name :
|
agree, watched the tv show when it was on, always remembe the red sunbeam as my dad had one, when i was in school
|
|
|
|
|
07-02-2008, 11:36 PM
|
#6
|
|
Bug Killer
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Bradenton, FL.
Posts: 1,775
Name :
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 72ragtop
agree, watched the tv show when it was on, always remembe the red sunbeam as my dad had one, when i was in school
|
Ken, that was no ordinary Sunbeam Alpine, that was a Sunbeam Tiger. A ford 289c.i. under the hood and less than 2000 pounds. Neat little car.
|
|
|
|
|
07-03-2008, 12:37 PM
|
#7
|
|
!ereH nI depparT m'I pleH
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: 25 miles south of Boston, MA. Also have a house in Dunedin FL.
Posts: 1,927
Name : Andy Anderson
|
I believe that the original ones used a 260 cu. in. (4.2 L) V8. I used to work withh a guy that had one, and his only complaint was that the rear axles weren't strong enough! The Mark II's had the 289's.
Andy
|
|
|
|
|
07-03-2008, 02:42 PM
|
#8
|
|
truth seeker
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: N. FLA
Posts: 372
Name :
|
Er.....I think this was all before my time. 
|
|
|
|
|
07-07-2008, 08:07 PM
|
#9
|
|
Bug Killer
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Bradenton, FL.
Posts: 1,775
Name :
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by navy2kcoupe
I believe that the original ones used a 260 cu. in. (4.2 L) V8. I used to work withh a guy that had one, and his only complaint was that the rear axles weren't strong enough! The Mark II's had the 289's.
Andy
|
My neighbor had one and I am pretty sure his was a 289, but he coulda been "braggin" a bit. 
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:58 AM.
|
Linear Mode
