And given the state of the economy and all the suffering going on, next Tuesday alot of $$ are going to thrown away on the inaugaration gala. I am all for some celebrating this day but it should be done with some responsible restraint...
You're equating "responsibility" with "politics"! Are you on crack?:rofl1:
It's going to be an interesting four (4) years to say the least.
As far as the policy on homosexuals serving in the military, I've always thought it was archaic, and rediculous.
All this moralistic bullchit is detrimental to our national secutity!:thumbsdown:
Most other countries allow people with, shall we say "other" sexual orientations" to serve in their military and it seems to be working ok for them:thumbsup:
The Brits, Aussies, etc.
Personally, I don't give a tinkers dam what you do off duty (sexually) as long as when the chit hits the fan, you stand your ground a fight!!!
Besides, we potentially lose a lot of qualified, top flight personnel due to some idiots ideological belief that if you're gay you can't serve.:shrug01:
Not only potential warriors but intelligence people, support staff, you name it?
Many moons ago I knew a Lt. (Navy) who was as gay as the day is long. He was an excellent Naval officer, an Military Intelligence type, and very good at what he did.
He was alos quite a decent person and one that you'd never have guessed his preferences when in uniform or in the "straight" society.
He worked out in the gym with us and could dead lift a damned truck as well!
He was "semi-open about his sexuality but had to be "careful" so as not to let the military find out???
This was long before the current (previous) policy and before alternative lifestyles were more socially accepted.
I think he finally ended up leaving the military as a result.
In doing so, we lost a potential career top notch military person and that person lost thier chance to serve the country.
Why???
Sexual preference aside, it's about time we unscrewed our heads from our assses and let those that qualify to serve do so!
If the persons "preference" makes them otherwise unsuitable for military service, then so be it...off you go!
But otherwise, stand aside and lets move on with the defense of the country.
As for this inaguration....all i can say is....it figures:nonod:
BTW-Anyone see or hear about the prez elects new "limo?"
Sounds more like an APC to me:lmao: