Well in another thread talking about radar detectors, this interesting perspective cropped up:
I think this may be a very valid point. So, here's the scenario... You were driving a bit faster then you should have, and for whatever reason, your radar detector failed to save you. The officer walks up to the driver's side window, leans over and looks in, spotting the detector. So he asks you "Do you mind telling me WHY you have a radar detector, sir?"
What do YOU say to this? Is there a legitimate reason for having one OTHER then the presumption that you intend to speed and you want this device to save your butt? So how would YOU answer that question?
I'll start off with an off the cuff example myself.....
"Oh! Is that what THAT is? It came with the car and I don't even know how to work it, officer........" :lmao:
Z06 Rocket said:PS, when you have a detector, and should you get stopped, you WILL get a citation. The police look at it as though you raised the stakes by using the detector, so you stand to loose more (ie no warnings, bigger pot in the game).
I think this may be a very valid point. So, here's the scenario... You were driving a bit faster then you should have, and for whatever reason, your radar detector failed to save you. The officer walks up to the driver's side window, leans over and looks in, spotting the detector. So he asks you "Do you mind telling me WHY you have a radar detector, sir?"
What do YOU say to this? Is there a legitimate reason for having one OTHER then the presumption that you intend to speed and you want this device to save your butt? So how would YOU answer that question?
I'll start off with an off the cuff example myself.....
"Oh! Is that what THAT is? It came with the car and I don't even know how to work it, officer........" :lmao: