shakedown067
Sinister C4
Man, I'm now hooked on this thread. It's like a freakin' train wreck. Good luck and I hope everyone rectifies the situation properly for you. I can't even imagine how livid you must be right now.
Man, I'm now hooked on this thread. It's like a freakin' train wreck. Good luck and I hope everyone rectifies the situation properly for you. I can't even imagine how livid you must be right now.
Man! This has got to be like the male version of giving birth for you Rich. Breath, breath, don't push.![]()
Maybe with increasing age I'm getting more mellow. A few years back I would have popped at least three blood vessels in my brain.
Inside every older person is a younger person wondering WTF happened?
:shrug01:
Yeah... I quit believing years ago that the old codger in the mirror looking back at me is REALLY me..... :nonod:
Rich i don't think U R at this point yet:lmao::rofl1:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Mitchell jr" <bmjr@theengineshop.com>
To: "Rich Z" <rich@corvetteflorida.com>
Cc: "sales" <sales@latemodelengines.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2009 8:46 AM
Subject: LS Heads
> Rich,
> Ok, Some progress here. Took longer then what I was expecting but
> all and all I guess this is all the better. After indicating the heads
> on a block in our cnc as the guys at LME did we came up with I believe
> the same number or at least pretty close. Our numbers show that the
> heads for your build were off by .125" total width side to side. This
> means .0625 per head. Now I went through every head I have here and
> found that they are all off by approx. .030-.035" per head. The
> difference here is from your heads being milled, which had to be and no
> way around it, after all this is what achieves the exact compression
> desired. This is why in all engine bulds there is always some sort of
> modification needed due to other modifications. In this case here yes
> the original hole was off from GM spec but even if it were dead on, the
> fact that a mill was needed on the head deck it changes the location of
> the intake holes. So what we decided to do here since all of our heads
> have the holes off from where your build would need them after milling
> and to salvage all of the extensive labor that LME has put into these
> heads, we installed aluminum bolts with loctite to seal up the existing
> hole and remachined the new holes in the exact location needed for your
> build. I also noticed in the pictures sent from the shop installing the
> manifold in the first place that the manifold was not seated onto the
> heads but hung up on the lower portion of the valve cover rail so I
> Machined this as well for proper fit. The heads will be finished here in
> approx. two hours and am doing what I can to get UPS or Fed ex here to
> pick them up. They are on a delivery only schedule today and we are
> closed next week but if need be I will come in next week for UPS to pick
> up. I know you had some original concerns about any modifications but in
> this case we really just had no choice and really are not talking about
> anything out of the ordinary. Personally I would have elongated the
> holes in the manifold as we do on a lot of engines but I know you did
> not want to do that. I went this route instead of the inserts because I
> just felt that it was a stronger and more integral and permanent fix.
> You will have no problem with this and don't have to worry about this at
> all. It will live forever. When we are done with the fix I can send you
> a photo for you to see and more then likely will not even be able to see
> the actual fix when we are done.
> Happy Holidays and thanks for your patience,
> Billy
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rich Z" <rich@corvetteflorida.com>
To: "Chris Harwood" <chris.harwood@motorsportsxtreme.com>
Cc: "Bill Mitchell jr" <bmjr@theengineshop.com>; "Bryan Neelen" <sales@latemodelengines.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2009 9:19 AM
Subject: Fw: LS Heads
> Chris,
>
> What do you think of this? Would this be acceptable to you if this were
> YOUR engine that you just spent $16K on? My concern would be the matching
> of the intake ports on the heads to the intake manifold. Can you send my
> intake manifold to LME so they can make certain this will not be an issue?
> Porting needed? I have to admit I'm not real comfortable with getting
> "fixed" heads, but I would imagine there is the issue of re-machining new
> heads that someone will have to eat the expense for. But I don't want it to
> be ME that is drawing the short straw with this deal, though no fault of my
> own. So to be acceptable I want some concessions made, please. (1) I want
> the intake manifold ports and intake ports of the heads matched and ported
> so there is no restriction from misalignment whatsoever. And (2) I want
> that "fix" of the heads, with the understanding that it has been known
> upfront that this will be a turbo forced induction engine, to be warranted
> for life. Not anything else but the fact that if that "fix" fails, that I
> will be covered without that expense coming out of my own pocket. I'm not
> talking about everything on the heads being covered, just those bolt holes
> holding the intake manifold in place that are being adapted to fix this
> misalignment problem.
>
> Also, to whoever can answer this one, a question about the milling of the
> heads for compression ratio modification. I understand that the compression
> on my engine will be 9.5:1, which is low compared to a typical high
> performance engine of this nature. What is the compression ratio of the
> heads, as is, when placed on an engine such as mine without milling to
> increase the compression?
>
> Merry Christmas, everyone!
>
> Thanks,
>
> Rich Z.
>
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Mitchell jr" <bmjr@theengineshop.com>
To: "Rich Z" <rich@corvetteflorida.com>
Cc: "Chris Harwood" <chris.harwood@motorsportsxtreme.com>; "Bryan Neelen" <sales@latemodelengines.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2009 11:15 AM
Subject: Re: Fw: LS Heads
> Rich,
> I have no doubt in my mind that this repair will not be a factor in the
> future. As far as your question on compression. There are many ways to
> skin a cat when building an engine. The combination of bore size,
> chamber size and dome size as well as piston to head quench. So there
> really is no right or wrong here it can be accomplished by changing any
> one of these factors and made up some where else. The truth of the
> matter you can really only estimate in the planning stage of an engine
> and when the parts from many different manufacturers arrive, it is then
> when the true calculations can be figured and at that point the engine
> builder formulates a plan to what he thinks should be done to achieve
> his combination and end result. Every engine builder has their own
> methods and opinions. Of course opinions are just that and when shopping
> for engines or car builders and even part manufactures, you are making
> your ultimate choice on their reputation and as long as their reputation
> is good then I would trust their opinion. I think you have made some
> good choices here and I think you will be very happy in the end result.
> Any way UPS has turned us down for today and we are checking if we can
> drive these heads over to Fed Ex today.
> Happy Holidays,
> Billy
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rich Z" <rich@corvetteflorida.com>
To: "Bill Mitchell jr" <bmjr@theengineshop.com>
Cc: "Bryan Neelen" <sales@latemodelengines.com>; "Chris Harwood" <chris.harwood@motorsportsxtreme.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2009 4:13 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: LS Heads
> Thanks Billy,
>
> "I have no doubt in my mind that this repair will not be a factor in the
> future."
>
> So you are willing to stand behind that, in response to my stated
> stipulations for making that repair to the heads?
>
> Have a nice Christmas. I hope you can get those heads out today so this
> won't carry over to next week.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Rich Z.
>
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Mitchell jr" <bmjr@theengineshop.com>
To: "Rich Z" <rich@corvetteflorida.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2009 5:32 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: LS Heads
> Rich,
> Never made it out. We were ready by noon but Fedex or Ups were not
> accepting. A few of us will be in Tuesday and will get out then. Sorry.
> I'd do it Monday but will not be in town.
> Billy
>
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rich Z" <rich@corvetteflorida.com>
To: "Bill Mitchell jr" <bmjr@theengineshop.com>
Cc: "Chris Harwood" <chris.harwood@motorsportsxtreme.com>; "Bryan Neelen" <sales@latemodelengines.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2009 6:44 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: LS Heads
> Billy,
>
> Unless my stipulations are met, then I am not willing to accept "fixed"
> heads.
>
> To reiterate, they are:
>
>
>>>>>(1) I want the intake manifold ports and intake ports of the heads
>>>>>matched and ported so there is no restriction from misalignment
>>>>>whatsoever. And (2) I want that "fix" of the heads, with the
>>>>>understanding that it has been known upfront that this will be a turbo
>>>>>forced induction engine, to be warranted for life. Not anything else
>>>>>but the fact that if that "fix" fails, that I will be covered without
>>>>>that expense coming out of my own pocket. I'm not talking about
>>>>>everything on the heads being covered, just those bolt holes holding the
>>>>>intake manifold in place that are being adapted to fix this misalignment
>>>>>problem.
>
> I talked to Chris today and he said the only milling done to those heads was
> to square them up, and they were not extensively cut to adjust for
> compression. Again, please note that this is a low compression engine, so
> milling the heads to raise the compression, especially since those pistons
> are a reverse dome style to get the compression to 9.5:1, wouldn't have been
> necessary. Also, if those heads had been milled enough to affect the
> alignment of the intake manifold mounting bolts, then quite likely the
> matching of the head intake ports to the intake manifold would be equally
> affected. Hence stipulation #2 above.
>
> Perhaps it is very fortunate that those heads could not be shipped out
> today, as it appears that you purposely avoided answering my questions about
> those stipulations I mentioned in my previous emails. Perhaps an oversight
> on your part, but now you have time to answer them.
>
> I'm starting to feel that some dodging is taking place now. I don't really
> know all that much about engine building, but I can tell when someone is
> beginning to go into CYA mode and wanting me to be the fall guy as a result.
> If those heads were extensively machined as you state to throw those intake
> manifold bolts so far out of alignment, then what in God's name would happen
> if someone wanted to build a 12:1 compression engine using them? How far
> would THAT put those intake manifold bolts out of alignement? Sorry, but it
> just doesn't make sense to me that LME would have machined all that metal
> off of the mating surfaces of the heads to the block for a 9.5:1 compression
> engine.
>
> In effect, you are saying this is LME's fault for shaving too much metal off
> of those heads? That IS what you are claiming, you know. So tell me,
> exactly how much metal was taken off in relation to a stock LS7X head that
> you typically send out? Certainly both you and LME took those measurements.
>
> So I am requesting you to NOT send those heads until these stipulations
> listed here have been agreed to by all parties involved. I don't want an
> engine that is flawed from the beginning with mismatched intake ports or any
> other problems that the intake manifold bolt alignment issue may prove later
> on to just be the tip of the iceberg.
>
> If those stipulations are not agreed to and you ship out those heads anyway,
> then I am requesting that LME REFUSE delivery of those heads when they show
> up there and begin processing a FULL refund for the money Chris paid for
> that World Products engine in my behalf. I've waited this damn long because
> of this screw up, so I can certainly wait for an engine to be built using
> another block and heads from another supplier. So in essence, if this can't
> be done right for me, no, I'm NOT spending $16K for something jury rigged
> and patched because of a flaw that World Products isn't willing to own up
> to. And I'll be perfectly honest, I really resent this entire crappy
> situation taking place for something I had been so looking forward to.
>
> Yeah, that's right, I'm getting PISSED about this now...
>
> And in case you missed it above:
>
> DO NOT SEND OUT THOSE HEADS UNTIL MY STIPULATIONS HAVE BEEN AGREED TO! THEY
> ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE WITHOUT THOSE STIPULATIONS BEING MET!
>
> Rich Z.